There are numerous critical appraisal tools. In selecting a tool focus on:
- Aligning the tool with WHY you are appraising the literature
- Choosing a VALIDATED tool
- Ensuring it is the most up-to-date version
- Selecting a tool aligned with your field of study
- Giving careful consideration to how it addresses bias relative to the type of studies you have selected for critical appraisal.
The list below represents some of the most extensively used appraisal tools:
- LEGEND (Let Evidence Guide Every New Decision) supports evidence-based decision making in support of the best patient outcomes. It provides a suite of appraisal forms detailed in a summary matrix that cross references 'Type of Study/Study Design' by the 'Domain of the Clinical Question'.
- MetaQAT (Meta Quality Appraisal Tool) supports appraising the quality of public health evidence using different tools and templates to support documentation and a guide for their use.
- CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) offers skills training and a range of critical appraisal and checklist tools.
- AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) assesses systematic reviews that include randomized or non-randomized studies of healthcare, or both.
- GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) provides guidelines for grading the quality of evidence in healthcare research and policy.
- AACODS (Authority, Accuracy, Coverage Objectivity, Date, Significance) is a checklist for evaluating and critically appraising grey literature.
- AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument II) assesses the quality of practice guidelines.